Get Permission Bharti, Kaur, and Kaur: Incidence of root canal treatment in anterior and posterior teeth and its association with the gender and age- A retrospective study


Introduction

Dental Caries commonness has expanded over the most recent forty years.1, 2 If the cariogenic climate persists in the oral cavity, the recently ejected long-lasting teeth might get decayed.1, 3 If left untreated, an infection in the dental pulp is likely to develop over time.1, 4

Epidemiological studies that provide comprehensive documentation of dental health records have been instrumental in enhancing the understanding of the incidence and distribution of individuals requiring endodontic treatment within a specific population.5 Epidemiology involves the study of diseases that impact a community or population as a whole, rather than focusing on individual cases.5, 6

Endodontic treatment involves various procedures aimed at repairing and addressing issues in a tooth with damaged or exposed pulp, as well as treating conditions affecting the periapical tissues. This treatment also covers situations where the tooth’s pulp is severely damaged due to trauma or infection, necessitating its removal. When this procedure is required, the tooth must be sealed at the root, allowing it to maintain structural functionality.

Endodontic treatment aims to achieve the main objectives:

  1. (a) To ensure a clean root canal by minimizing bacterial presence to a level that prevents pathological effects.

  2. (b) Sealing the root at the apex blocks fluid entry, which could otherwise feed any lingering bacteria in the root canal. This barrier also prevents irritants from escaping into the periapical tissues.

  3. (c) To establish a coronal seal that protects the pulp chamber from being re-contaminated by oral bacteria from the mouth.7, 8

Root canals are intricate 3D structures with unique anatomical variations, making each one distinct. Ensuring a 3D obturation with thorough coronal, lateral, and apical seals is crucial for long-term success.9

It has been suggested that data on the indications and patterns of root canal treatment are essential for understanding disease trends, which aids in developing effective preventive and management strategies. This information also improves the understanding of common oral health issues across different gender and age groups.10, 11

Several factors impact success rates, with patient age being particularly significant. Research shows that older patients generally experience higher failure rates than younger patients. This is also linked to the higher prevalence of periodontal disease in older adults, which can lead to bone loss around teeth and may eventually result in the extraction of the endodontically treated tooth.7

Hence the aim of the study is to evaluate the frequency of root canal treatments in particular teeth and analyze its correlation with the patient’s gender and age.

Materials and Methods

The data for the present study was retrieved from the records of the dental department from December 2022 to May 2024. Data of 2275 patients, out of which 797 were males and 1478 were females. Ethical clearance was obtained. Medical records that lacked sufficient information were excluded.

For the present study, inclusion criteria were data of patients with endodontically treated teeth. Age, gender, and tooth number with endodontic treatment were the data collected. Microsoft Excel was used to tabulate all of the collected data. Data was analyzed using a computer software program, SPSS 20.

Results

In our study, the majority of the patients undergoing endodontic treatment were between 31-40 years of age (36%) (Table 3). The most common tooth to undergo root canal treatment was mandibular first molar followed by mandibular second molar (Table 1). When gender and tooth count were correlated, the mandibular first molar underwent root canal therapy the most frequently in both genders (Table 2). 

Table 1

Table showing distribution of patients based on endodontically treated teeth

Frequency

Percent

Maxillary Tooth-Anterior

Canine

65

27.5%

Central Incisor

86

36.4%

Lateral Incisor

85

36.0%

Total

236

100.0%

Maxillary Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

110

14.2%

First molar

309

39.9%

Second premolar

149

19.3%

Second molar

204

26.4%

Third molar

2

.3%

Total

774

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Anterior

Canine

34

40.0%

Central Incisor

36

42.4%

Lateral Incisor

15

17.6%

Total

85

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

65

5.5%

First molar

564

47.8%

Second premolar

166

14.1%

Second molar

385

32.6%

Third molar

0

0.0%

Total

1180

100.0%

Table 2

 Table showing association of gender with endodontically treated teeth

Sex

Chi-Square

p-value

Male

Female

Total

Maxillary Tooth-Anterior

Canine

27

30.3%

38

25.9%

65

27.5%

1.350

.509

Central Incisor

34

38.2%

52

35.4%

86

36.4%

Lateral Incisor

28

31.5%

57

38.8%

85

36.0%

Total

89

100.0%

147

100.0%

236

100.0%

Maxillary Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

34

13.6%

76

14.5%

110

14.2%

2.192

0.7

First molar

102

40.8%

207

39.5%

309

39.9%

Second premolar

42

16.8%

107

20.4%

149

19.3%

Second molar

71

28.4%

133

25.4%

204

26.4%

Third molar

1

.4%

1

.2%

2

.3%

Total

250

100.0%

524

100.0%

774

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Anterior

Canine

10

32.3%

24

44.4%

34

40.0%

1.783

.410

Central Incisor

16

51.6%

20

37.0%

36

42.4%

Lateral Incisor

5

16.1%

10

18.5%

15

17.6%

Total

31

100.0%

54

100.0%

85

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

17

4.0%

48

6.4%

65

5.5%

5.933

0.115

First molar

208

48.7%

356

47.3%

564

47.8%

Second premolar

52

12.2%

114

15.1%

166

14.1%

Second molar

150

35.1%

235

31.2%

385

32.6%

Third molar

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

Total

427

100.0%

753

100.0%

1180

100.0%

Table 3

 Table showing association of age with endodontically treated teeth

Age

Chi-Square

p-value

10-20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51-60

>60

Total

Maxillary Tooth-Anterior

Canine

3

7.0%

18

25.0%

19

35.2%

24

48.0%

1

10.0%

0

0.0%

65

27.5%

45.408

.0001**

Central Incisor

26

60.5%

34

47.2%

12

22.2%

6

12.0%

6

60.0%

2

28.6%

86

36.4%

Lateral Incisor

14

32.6%

20

27.8%

23

42.6%

20

40.0%

3

30.0%

5

71.4%

85

36.0%

Total

43

100.0%

72

100.0%

54

100.0%

50

100.0%

10

100.0%

7

100.0%

236

100.0%

Maxillary Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

2

6.7%

30

16.0%

49

16.2%

21

11.7%

7

10.6%

1

14.3%

110

14.2%

19.141

0.513

First molar

16

53.3%

78

41.5%

117

38.6%

72

40.0%

26

39.4%

0

0.0%

309

39.9%

Second premolar

4

13.3%

37

19.7%

59

19.5%

30

16.7%

16

24.2%

3

42.9%

149

19.3%

Second molar

8

26.7%

43

22.9%

76

25.1%

57

31.7%

17

25.8%

3

42.9%

204

26.4%

Third molar

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

2

.7%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

2

.3%

Total

30

100.0%

188

100.0%

303

100.0%

180

100.0%

66

100.0%

7

100.0%

774

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Anterior

Canine

0

0.0%

9

50.0%

13

35.1%

8

61.5%

1

50.0%

3

37.5%

34

40.0%

12.785

0.236

Central Incisor

4

57.1%

6

33.3%

19

51.4%

3

23.1%

0

0.0%

4

50.0%

36

42.4%

Lateral Incisor

3

42.9%

3

16.7%

5

13.5%

2

15.4%

1

50.0%

1

12.5%

15

17.6%

Total

7

100.0%

18

100.0%

37

100.0%

13

100.0%

2

100.0%

8

100.0%

85

100.0%

Mandibular Tooth-Posterior

First premolar

3

4.1%

13

4.4%

25

5.9%

17

5.6%

4

6.9%

3

12.5%

65

5.5%

42.088

.0001**

First molar

52

70.3%

153

51.9%

191

45.0%

135

44.3%

22

37.9%

11

45.8%

564

47.8%

Second premolar

4

5.4%

27

9.2%

71

16.7%

43

14.1%

14

24.1%

7

29.2%

166

14.1%

Second molar

15

20.3%

102

34.6%

137

32.3%

110

36.1%

18

31.0%

3

12.5%

385

32.6%

Third molar

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

Total

74

100.0%

295

100.0%

424

100.0%

305

100.0%

58

100.0%

24

100.0%

1180

100.0%

Discussion

Endodontic treatment is performed by practitioners to save a tooth that has experienced some form of pulp damage. This encompasses situations where the damage affects the periradicular tissues as well. It is performed because retaining natural teeth is crucial for ensuring the complete function of the dentition, along with the health benefits that come from having a fully functional set of teeth.7

Our study indicates that there were 1,478 female cases, which is slightly higher than the number of male patients that is 797 required endodontic treatment. A similar study conducted by Aditya Jain reported that 50.91% of the patients were female, while 49.09% were male who required endodontic treatment.1 The same study conducted by Augusto César Braz Hollanda shows 61.9% of female cases whereas 38.1% of male patients.12 However, the similar study done by Blake E Wayman shows high number of male patients than female patients (1958 male patients and 1392 female patients).13 Research suggests that females tend to be more conscious of their breath and overall oral health, which likely makes them more proactive and motivated to seek oral healthcare services. 1, 12

Most patients, representing 36%, fell within the 31-40 age group, indicating a high incidence of endodontic treatment among this demographic survey. According to a survey conducted by Patro, individuals in the 35-44 age group exhibit a high incidence of dental caries, with 82.4% of participants affected.14 A study conducted by Ogini AO reveals that individuals aged 17-34 have a greater need for dental treatment.15 A similar survey conducted by TH Farrell indicated that individuals aged 21-30 had a higher prevalence of endodontic treatment.16 Our findings align with those of Awotile et al., indicating a 24.1% incidence rate among individuals aged 30-39.17

According to our study, the mandibular first molar showed the highest incidence of endodontic treatment, with 564 cases, accounting for 47.8%. This was followed by the mandibular second molar, which had 385 cases, representing 32.6% of the individuals. The study done by Rosa Scavo shows right mandibular first molar high incidence 89 cases i.e. 9.12% whereas left mandibular second molar shows 65 cases i.e. 6.66% cases.5 Survey done by Md.Asda Hussain  also show higher incidence mandibular first molars i.e. 43.7% followed by mandibular second molar i.e. 26% for endodontic treatment.18The mandibular first molar is likely the most vulnerable to caries because it is the first tooth to erupt in the oral cavity. Additionally, mandibular molars tend to experience greater food stagnation compared to maxillary molars. This highlights the critical importance of implementing preventive measures specifically for lower molars.19

According to a survey, mandibular teeth undergo endodontic treatment more often (55.6%) than maxillary teeth (44.3%). In contrast, a survey by ARS Al-Nergrish shows that maxillary teeth are more frequently treated with endodontic procedures (77.7%) compared to mandibular teeth (22.3%).20 Krystyna Pietrzyckamore also show mandibular teeth preserved more (average 9.26 teeth) than in the maxilla (average 7.88 teeth).21 This may be attributed to aesthetic concerns, as upper teeth are more noticeable than lower teeth when smiling. Consequently, patients often prioritize maintaining the appearance of their upper teeth.1

Conclusion

Majority of the patients undergoing root canal treatment were females and mandibular first molars were the most common teeth to undergo root canal treatment among both the genders.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Jain Anjaneyulu, Incidence of Root Canal Treatment in Posterior Teeth and its Association with the Gender - A Retrospective StudyJ Res Med Dent Sci20225415

2 

M Mortazavi M Mesbahi MR Azar G Ansari MTA pulpotomy in primary molars-A prospective studyRes J Biol Sci20094515

3 

P Carrotte Endodontic treatment for childrenBr Dent J20051981915

4 

F Elizabeth Martin Carious Pulpitis: Microbiological And Histopathological ConsiderationsAust Ortod J20032931347

5 

R Scavo RM Lalis O Zmener S DiPietro D Grana Frequency and distribution of teeth requiring endodontic therapy in an Argentine population attending a specialty clinic in endodonticsInt Dent J201161525760

6 

HM Eriksen Endodontology--epidemiologic considerationsEndod Dent Traumatol19917518995

7 

J Nicholson B Czarnecka 10 - Materials for root canal fillingMaterials Direct Restor Teeth2016197216

8 

NM Ismail AR Ismail W Wan Root canal treatment in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia Dental Clinic - a 5-year retrospective study2008https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Root-canal-treatment-in-Hospital-Universiti-Sains-a-Ismail-Ismail/6fe3103a944eed86f2150323b873c61164ff6f1e

9 

NS Gasner M Brizuela Endodontic Materials Used To Fill Root CanalsStatPearls Publishing2023

10 

A Umanah B Osagbemiro A Arigbede Pattern of demand for endodontic treatment by adult patients in port-harcourt, South-South NigeriaJ West Afr College Surg2012231223

11 

O Ibhawoh Louis J Enabulele Retrospective analysis of reasons for conventional root canal treatment of permanent teeth in a Nigerian tertiary hospitalNigerian J Dent Sci202021-21321

12 

AC Hollanda AH De Alencar CR Estrela MR Bueno C Estrela Prevalence of endodontically treated teeth in a Brazilian adult populationBrazilian Dent J20081943137

13 

BE Wayman JA Patten SE Dazey Relative frequency of teeth needing endodontic treatment in 3350 consecutive endodontic patientsJ Endod1994208399401

14 

Bk Patro BR Kumar A Goswami VP Mathur B Nongkynrih Prevalence of dental caries among adults and elderly in an urban resettlement colony of New DelhiIndian J Dent Res2008192958

15 

AO Oginni Dental care needs and demands in patients attending the dental hospital of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital's Complex Ile-IfeNigerian J Med: J Nat Assoc Resid Doc Nigeria200413433944

16 

TH Farrell FJ Burke Root canal treatment in the General Dental Service 1948-1987Brit Dent J198916662038

17 

A Awotile L Enone O Temitope A retrospective study of endodontic treatment among patients in Southwest NigeriaEdorium J Dent20229219

18 

AH Asdaq S Naz HM Singh A Singh M Haque HK Shah Reasons and Pattern of Demand for Root Canal Treatment Among Patients Attending A Tertiary Care Center of Madhesh Province: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Med PhoenixNepal J Online2023812632

19 

I De Quadros BP Gomes AA Zaia CC Ferraz FJ Souza-Filho Evaluation of endodontic treatments performed by students in a Brazilian Dental SchoolJ Dent Educ20056910116170

20 

AR Al-Negrish Incidence and distribution of root canal treatment in the dentition among a Jordanian sub populationInt Dent J20025231259

21 

K Pietrzycka M Radwanski JP Matinlinna M Lukomska-Szymanska The prevalence of root canal treatment, periapical status, and coronal restorations in elderly patients in the polish populationHeliyon20141017e35584



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 23-10-2024

Accepted : 26-11-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.adr.2024.018


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 180

PDF Downloaded: 49