Get Permission Swetha MU, Rao, Ashok K, Sarkar, Eshwar, and Jyothi S: Guardians of the temporomandibular joint: The occlusal splints- an overview


Introduction

The Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the joint between the skull base and mandible. TMJ disorders (TMD) or Craniomandibular disorder (CMD) refers to conditions producing abnormal, incomplete or impaired function of the temporomandibular joint(s) and the muscles of mastication.1 The common signs and symptoms of TMD are joint sounds, pain, limited or asymmetrical jaw movement which may affect the quality of life. Anderson et al.2 reported that approximately 75% of the population are having at least one sign of joint dysfunction (viz. tenderness on palpation, joint noises, deviation during movements etc.). Prosthodontics is a multidimensional speciality which offers numerous treatment options for the betterment of patients with TMDs. It essentially requires complete examination of the patient in relation to the masticatory apparatus with differential diagnosis for the TMD.3 Several definitive and supportive treatment modalities have been well documented which includes occlusal splints, counselling, physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, surgical treatment and a combination of the above,4 amongst which the most commonly used treatment option is the occlusal splint therapy.

An Occlusal splint is defined as a removable artificial occlusal surface used for diagnosis or therapy affecting the relationship of the mandible to the maxilla.1 Occlusal splint therapy may be defined as “the art and science of establishing neuromuscular harmony in the masticatory system by creating a mechanical disadvantage for parafunctional forces with removable appliances.” These appliances can be indicated for occlusal stabilization/malocclusion, prevention of the wear of dentition /parafunctional habits, fatigued masticatory muscles, headaches, sore teeth, noisy and uncomfortable temporomandibular joints and /or for treatment of TMJ disorders.3 According to Dawson, one of the primary principle of these appliances is, to alter an occlusion which may have been the reason for preventing complete seating of the condyles into the centric relation.5

Although, there are different types of occlusal appliances which are documented to treat temporomandibular disorders, there is considerable debate about its application, design, fabrication, its effectiveness and follow up of occlusal appliances. Hence a thorough knowledge of the each type of occlusal appliances becomes mandatory.

This paper is an overview of various types of occlusal appliances, its design, appropriate application in the diagnosis and management of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Purpose of an Occlusal Appliance3, 4, 5, 6

  1. To provide diagnostic information

  2. To protect teeth and associated structures from parafunction if any

  3. To allow the condyle to seat in CR

  4. To reduce muscle contraction and/or associated forces on the TMJ

Classification of Occlusal Splints

According to Okeson7

  1. Stabilization appliance: Anterior repositioning appliances (ARA) / Mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance (MORA)

  2. Other types: Anterior bite plane, Posterior bite plane, Pivoting appliance, Soft/resilient appliance (silicone)

According to dawson7

  1. Permissive splints/muscle deprogrammers8These splints allow unrestricted movement of the mandible, by guiding the teeth unimpeded over the opposing biting surface. Majority of the splints fall under this group. eg: bite planes, anterior jig, Lucia jig, stabilisation appliance like- Tanner splint, flat plane splint, superior repositioning splints.

  2. Non-permissive splints /Directive splints8 These splints have ramps or indentations that limit the movement of the mandible. Eg: anterior repositioning appliance (ARA) and Mandibular orthopaedic repositioning appliance (MORA).

  3. Pseudo permissive splints.9These splints do not provide the characteristics of either of the above two which are necessary for successful splint therapy.eg. Soft splints, Hydrostatic splint.

According to Stavicek (JCO 1989 feb)

  1. Myopathic

  2. Decompression

  3. Compression

  4. Verticalization

  5. Anterior repositioning

Materials Used for Splint Appliances (Table 1)

Types of splints used for TMDs

Permissive splints

These are designed to eliminate noxious harmful occlusal contacts and promote orthopaedic stability and harmonious masticatory muscle function. They primarily function to alter the occlusion so that teeth do not interfere with complete seating of the condyles and to alter muscle forces like the usual flat-plane appliances.10

The two classic designs of permissive splints are.

  1. Anterior midpoint contact splints. Egs: B splints, Bite planes, Lucia jig, NTI, Leaf gauge, kois deprogrammer.

  2. Full contact splints (stabilizing splints) Egs: Michigan splint (flat plane), shore, repositioning appliances, tanner / centric relation splints.

Anterior Midpoint Contact Splints: (Figure 1)

These occlusal splints allow the contact of the incisors only resulting in reduction of the clenching forces to 20-30% of maximum clenching force as per EMG studies. It removes occlusal interferences allowing complete joint seating on closure.11 It encourages release of the lateral pterygoid and anterior ligaments on closure. It is given when muscle disorders are suspected like acute or chronic muscle pain.8 it is advised to be used during night time and not for more than 10-12 hrs/day, if worn for longer than 24-48 hrs continuously, they may cause supra eruption of posterior teeth due to lack of contact.2

Anterior bite plane

The anterior bite plane is a hard acrylic appliance worn over the maxillary teeth that provides contact with only the mandibular anterior teeth and no posterior teeth in occlusion. It is usually flat & parallel to the occlusal plane. Anterior jig, Lucia jig, Hawley bite plane, anterior deprogrammer and Sved plate 12 are the types of anterior bite planes. These must be used only for short periods under close monitoring.

Mechanism of action

It is primarily intended to disengage the posterior teeth about 2-3 mm to establish a neuro-muscular reconditioning and thus eliminate their influence on the function or dysfunction of the masticatory system. Thereby aiding the relaxation of the muscles (the lateral pterygoid) and encourage the readaptation of condyle to the rest position.13

Indications14

  1. Treatment of muscle disorders related to orthopaedic instability or an acute change in the occlusal condition.

  2. Parafunctional activity associated with unfavourable posterior tooth contacts can also be treated but only for short periods.

Limitations

If the appliance is worn continuously for more than 3-4 weeks, the unopposed mandibular teeth might supraerupt, resulting in an anterior open bite15 and may add to a TMJ overload without the posterior contacts.

Lucia jig

Lucia jig is a neuromuscular deprogramming device. It is a type of modification of anterior bite plane placed between the maxillary and mandibular incisors.

Mechanism of action

It acts by de-programing the proprioceptive patterns of habitual contact between teeth (engram) changing the mandibular closure pattern and allowing the condyles to seat in the most superior position.16

Indications

  1. In full mouth rehabilitation cases to establish centric relation by eliminating any type of occlusal contacts.

  2. In cases where muscle relaxation is required to make jaw manipulation easier.10

  3. In cases of muscular hyperactivity 17, 18

Limitations

  1. Owing to the small size, possibility of aspiration or ingestion,

  2. Mobility of anterior teeth and

  3. Occlusal changes if used unmonitored for a long time

Fabrication19

It can be either fabricated from acrylic resin on a dental cast or can use a prefabricated jig which can be relined with impression compound or PVS type rigid bite registration material. It should extend from the labial aspect to the palatine aspect of the tooth to be included. Both sides should converge to a wedge-shaped vertex on the labial aspect. Prefabricated jigs are selected according to the patient’s dentition. Then the patient is instructed to slowly occlude the mandibular central incisors on the vertex of the resin until the posterior teeth were approximately 1 mm apart. The Lucia jig is adjusted with a pear-shaped tungsten drill so that it has only one contact point in the palatine wedge vertex against the mandibular central incisors, in the midline and when the mouth is closed, providing a 1 mm maximum disocclusion between the posterior teeth.

NTI-Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibition Tension Suppression System

The NTI-tss device is a modified anterior bite plane which is narrower than the regular bite plane. It covers only two maxillary (or mandibular) central incisors. This is also known as "miniature anterior bite appliance".20 Duration to be worn is about 6 to 8 weeks.

Mechanism of action

NTI splint has a “disoccluding element” which contacts the two mandibular central incisors upon closure.21 The NTI-tts splints primarily function to relax the muscles involved in bruxing by reducing nociceptive stimulation.

Indications

It is indicated for the prevention and treatment of sleep bruxism, temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), tension-type headaches, and migraine which is triggered by hyperactivity of the trigeminal nerve causing migraine like events.22 Hence it is used always while sleeping.

Limitations

Aspiration, ingestion, mobility of anterior teeth and occlusal changes after prolonged unmonitored use.

Fabrication

It is fabricated by selecting a standard acrylic matrix form that fits passively over the maxillary incisors and filled with acrylic, which is then left to polymerize intraorally. This increases the vertical dimension between the maxillary and mandibular jaw. Adjustments along the outer surface of the bite stop are made by the dentist to ensure that at jaw closure and during excursive movements tooth contacts are present only between the intraoral device and the incisal embrasures of the antagonistic teeth.23

Table 1

Materials used for splint appliances

Material

Hard acrylic resins (methyl methacrylate)

Soft plastic pressure molded polyvinyl

Dual laminated

Advantages

Adjustments are easy and quick

Can engage into available undercuts for better retention

Can be used in severe grinding

Easily repaired

Long lasting

Accurate fit Reliable method of fabrication

An be layered with hard acrylic to contact/occlude opposing dentition for stable occlusion.

More comfortable than traditional hard splints: 24

Longevity

More comfortable for the patient

Can be fabricated chairside

Colour stability

Easy to construct

Disadvantages

Polymerization shrinkage may result in less accurate fit

Requires special equipment for fabrication

Bulk is more

Ball clasps may be required as the rigid undercuts would be eliminated which may apply pressure on the interdental papillae

Expensive

Takes time for patient to adapt

Difficult to adjust

Not recommended for heavy clenchers.

Less wear resistance

Dimensionally less stable 10

Table 2

Summary of the splints

Splints

Indications

Duration of use

Arch of use

Anterior bite plane

Treatment of muscle disorders related to orthopaedic instability or an acute change in the occlusal condition.[45]

1-2 Weeks (short duration)

Maxilla

Parafunctional activity associated

Lucia Jig

To establish centric relation by eliminating any type of occlusal contacts

15mins

maxilla

Where muscle relaxation is required to make jaw manipulation easier 11

2 weeks

Muscular hyperactivity.

NTI

Sleep bruxism

2 weeks

Mandible

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)

(only during night)

Tension-type headaches, and migraine

Stabilization

TMJ and/or muscle disorders and pain

24hrs/day

Maxilla or mandible

Appliance (Michigan and Tanner’s appliance)

Severe bruxism

Diagnosis and treatment of trauma from occlusion to any

Stabilization of mobile maxillary teeth and to

Prevent supraeruption of mandibular teeth

Tension headaches

Anterior repositioning appliance

Disc derangement disorders.

24 hrs/ day for 3 months

maxilla

Patients with joint sounds (eg: a single or reciprocal click).

Intermittent or chronic locking of the joint (e.g., retrodiscitis).

Posterior bite plane appliance or mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance(MORA)

TMD’S

Case dependant

Mandible

Soft or resilient appliance

Protective athletic splints

4-6 months

Maxilla / mandible

Clenching and bruxism,

To reduce symptoms of joint dysfunction or myalgia.

Pivoting appliance

Osteoarthritis of the TMJs,

24hrs/day

Mandible

Acute unilateral disc dislocation without reduction.

Figure 1

Anterior midpoint contact splints (A: anterior bite plane; B: NiTi; C: Lucia jig)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7afe5705-2f81-4a9c-a497-a5fb1fb85ddeimage1.png
Figure 2

Stabilization splints (or) Muscle relaxation splints (A: Michigan; B: Tanner’s)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7afe5705-2f81-4a9c-a497-a5fb1fb85ddeimage2.png
Figure 3

Non permissive splints- respositioning appliance (A: anterior repositioning splint; B: MORA)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7afe5705-2f81-4a9c-a497-a5fb1fb85ddeimage3.png
Figure 4

Others (A: soft splint; B: pivot splint; C: Hydrostatic splint)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7afe5705-2f81-4a9c-a497-a5fb1fb85ddeimage4.png

Stabilization Splints (Or Muscle Relaxation Splints (Mrs: (Figure 2))

These stabilization splints are commonly used to treat masticatory dysfunctions (muscle hyperactivity) by decreasing related parafunctional activity which is usually accompanied with signs and symptoms like muscular pain, TMJ pain, clicking, crepitus, limitation and in-coordination of mandibular movement periods of stress.25

Mechanism of action

Provides separation of the posterior teeth during the mandibular movements. It initiates simultaneous contact to occur occlusally as well as musculoskeletally. An adjustment of the splint is needed periodically so that the masticatory muscles relax until a consistent jaw relationship is achieved.

The aim to provide the patient with a stable occlusion in which the maximum number of simultaneous occlusal contacts are made with equal force between the opposing teeth.12 This also allows an adaptation of the temporomandibular joint apparatus by increasing the vertical dimension, occlusal stability and aids in self repositioning of the condyle in the glenoid fossa.

Whatever changes are seen in the maxillomandibular relation occur only due to variation in the thickness of the material. According to a study conducted by Pficer. J.K et al. (2017), only continuous use of this splint can cause reduction in symptoms of TMD’s. And concluded that by wearing splint for 24 hours per day results in occlusal stabilization.26

Indications27

  1. TMJ and/or muscle disorders and pain

  2. Severe bruxism

  3. Diagnosis and treatment of trauma from occlusion to any part of the masticatory system

  4. Stabilization of mobile maxillary teeth and to prevent eruption of mandibular teeth

  5. Differential diagnosis for patients with signs and symptoms imitating TMJ or muscle disorders, but without origin in the masticatory system.

  6. Treatment of patients with tension headaches

Limitations

As these splints do not prevent tooth clenching due to the contact of lower teeth, may aggravate the condition in few patients.

Fabrication

It is fabricated to the construction bite position, which is provided with the working models. The anterior portion has a slight incline that is balanced so as to allow lateral and protrusive movements with incisal guidance. The posterior acrylic has slight indexing of the maxillary posteriors to help maintain the pre-determined mandibular position as provided by the Construction Bite.

Commonly used stabilization splints are:

  1. Michigan splint / Gnathologic splint / flat plane splint

  2. Tanner’s splint

Michigan splint

It is a flat plane stabilization appliance usually made for maxillary arch in hard acrylic or polycarbonate material. This is most commonly used for stabilization and has least adverse effect.

The main features which separate the Michigan splint26 (Geering & Lang, 1978) from other stabilization splints are: (i) Always adjusted to centric relation. (ii) Freedom in centric zone: 0-5-1-0 mm on a flat surface. (iii) Cuspid rise starts about 1 mm from freedom in centric. (iv) No incisal guidance from centric occlusion. (v) Allows the condyles to seek optimal position. (vi) Can be used for indefinite time without change in occlusal relations of the teeth.

Tanner’s splint28, 29

The Tanner /CR Splint is a repositioning splint that is fabricated on the mandibular arch and is used to advance the mandible. It is a full-coverage splint with acrylic which contacts the maxillary anterior and posterior teeth.

Non permissive Splints- Respositioning Appliance (Figure 3)

Repositioning splints are used to recapture the displaced disc or to establish a better jaw position by moving the mandible either forward or backward into a protruded position. The construction and insertion of this splint has been described by Clark.30

Limitations

Prolonged usage for more than six weeks might change the bite permanently, lead to damage of the joint on a longer run.

Types of repositioning splints:

  1. Anterior repositioning splint or orthopedic repositioning appliance

  2. Posterior bite plane appliance or mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance(MORA)

Anterior repositioning appliance

The anterior repositioning appliance is an interocclusal device that encourages the mandible to assume more anterior position than the intercuspal position. It aims to provide a better condyle-disc relationship in the fossae so that normal function will be reestablished. The goal of treatment is not to alter the mandibular position permanently but only to change the position temporarily so as to enhance adaptation of the retrodiscal tissues.31 It is a full-arch hard acrylic device used in either arch. However, the maxillary arch is preferred because a guiding ramp can be more easily fabricated to direct the mandible into the desired forward position.

Mechanism of action

By maintaining the mandible in a temporary therapeutic position where the click is eliminated and thereby allowing the disc to reposition. To achieve a maximum success rate these splints should be worn on a 24-hour-a-day basis for 3 months, followed by a careful, controlled, gradual weaning off period. At follow-up visits, acrylic is ground by 1 mm every 4–6 weeks from the posterior areas to clear the occlusal aspect of the mandibular molars and premolars, thereby encouraging vertical eruption of these teeth, settling occlusion and re-establishing the position.32

Indications

  1. In cases of disc derangement disorders

  2. Patients with joint sounds (eg: a single or reciprocal click).

  3. Intermittent or chronic locking of the joint (e g, retrodiscitis).

Limitations

There could be permanent and irreversible occlusal changes on long term use.

Fabrication33, 34

The initial step in fabricating a maxillary anterior repositioning appliance is identical to that in fabricating a muscle relaxation appliance. The records needed are a maxillary and mandibular alginate impression and a protrusive mandibular bite record in a “post-clicking” position.

The anterior stop is constructed and the appliance is fitted to the maxillary teeth. The anterior stop must not be covered by the acrylic. When the anterior teeth are felt to contact in the groove on the anterior stop, the position is verified by opening and closing a few times. With the teeth resting together, the patient should gently place his tongue on the setting resin lingual to the anterior teeth and press. This will adapt the resin to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular anteriors and provide the needed ramp for guiding the mandible into the forward position.

Posterior Bite Plane Appliance or Mandibular Orthopedic Repositioning Appliance (MORA)

The MORA appliance was first described by Dr. Gelb.35 It is designed to reposition the mandible to achieve a neuromuscular balance and an optimal condylar-fossae relationship. It is more aesthetic than other splints and usually does not present any great problems while speaking or eating. Worn only on the mandibular arch.

Mechanism of action

The change in jaw position was said to relieve muscle tension in the head and neck, improving the individual's neuromuscular efficiency and dynamic balance.36

Indications

Treating temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Limitations37

  1. It is difficult to construct a guide ramp to direct the mandible into a protrusive position.

  2. During sleep or while reclining, the mandible can retrude even with the appliance in place.

  3. With prolonged wearing and/or heavy clenching, there may be intrusion of posterior teeth

  4. Eruption of mandibular incisors may occur if contact between the maxillary and mandibular incisors is not achieved during function.

Fabrication

The MORA is a partial coverage appliance and consists of two pads of acrylic, which sit on the mandibular bicuspids and molars and are connected by a metal lingual bar.

Others: (Figure 4)

Soft or resilient appliance5

Since 1942, Mathews38 recommended the use of soft occlusal splints. The soft appliance is a device fabricated from resilient material that is usually adapted to the maxillary teeth. Goals on achieving even and simultaneous contact with the opposing teeth. These appliances are usually worn only at night, will produce some symptomatic relief within 6 weeks. It is advised to be replaced after 4-6 months as they lose their resilience with the passage of time.

  1. Indications: Protective athletic splints decrease the likelihood of damage to the oral structures when trauma is received, Clenching and bruxism, to reduce symptoms of joint dysfunction or myalgia.

  2. Limitations: might encourage muscle hyperactivity 39

  3. Fabrication: The appliance is generally made out of 2 mm polyvinyl in a vacuum former. In case selectively thicker appliance is required layers can be added in certain areas and if thinner appliance is required then the sheet can be overheated in the former to ensure an even occlusal contact.

Hydrostatic splint40

To equalize the occlusal forces, water is used in this kind of splint. Hydrostatic cell is inserted between the upper and lower arch. The occlusal load is reorganized and evenly distributed throughout the stomatognathic system.

Pivoting appliance

It is a hard acrylic device that covers one arch and usually provides a single posterior contact in each quadrant. When superior force is applied under the chin, the tendency is to push the anterior teeth close together and pivot the condyles downward around the posterior pivoting point.41

Mechanism of action

The proposed principle is that the condyles are pulled downwards upon clenching on the pivot, which causes a mandibular torque with an upward direction, also this torque is smaller than one that would be caused by a more anterior pivot, thereby relieving traumatic load and giving the disk freedom to reassume a normal position. The contact in these splints is usually on most posterior tooth.42

Indications

To decrease intraarticular pressure and thus unload the articular surfaces of the joint. In treatment of symptoms related to osteoarthritis of the TMJs, acute unilateral disc dislocation without reduction.

Limitations

May cause occlusal changes as a posterior open bite in pivot area.43

Summary of the splints(Table 2)

Conclusion

Occlusal splint therapy has been used for diagnosis and treatment of various disorders of the masticatory system. Many designs are described in the literature. Despite the research since many years on the effect of occlusal splint design in general and its therapeutic benefit in particular remains controversial. Different conditions are treated by a different splint. A proper examination and differential diagnosis is the key in making a decision regarding the appropriate role of splint therapy for each problem. This article gives an insight to the clinicians to successfully implement splint therapy into their armamentarium of treatment options in managing masticatory system disorders. Perfect appliance with fewer complications should be delivered.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

KJ Ferro The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms9th1956134

2 

GC Anderson EL Schiffman KP Schellhas JR Fricton Clinical vs. arthrographic diagnosis of TMJ internal derangementJ Dent Res19896858269

3 

GC Anderson EL Schiffman KP Schellhas JR Fricton Clinical vs. arthrographic diagnosis of TMJ internal derangement.J Arthritis20206858269

4 

PE Dawson Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of occlusal problems322nd2007632

5 

TJ Dylina A common sense approach tosplint therapyJ Prosth Dent200186553945

6 

JP Okeson Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusionMosbySt. Louis1998512

7 

PE Dawson Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems2ndSt. Louis;Mosby1989186

8 

TJ Dylina The basics of occlusal splint therapy Dent Today2002217827

9 

K Bharadwaj The Basics of Occlusal Splints- A ReviewInt J of Adv Res20175123942

10 

S Dalal Occlusal splintsJ Dent Med Sci2018174516

11 

JR Mckee Comparing condylar positions achieved through bimanual manipulation to condylar positions achieved through masticatory muscle contraction against an anterior deprogrammer: A pilot studyJ Prosthet Dent200594438993

12 

RJ Gray SJ Davies Occlusal splints and temporomandibular disorders: why, when, how?Dent Update20012841949

13 

JP Ré Perez The occlusal splint therapyInt J Stomatol Occlusion Med2009282610.1007/s12548-009-0015-y.

14 

An Original dental appliance for esthetic occlusal vertical dimension rehabilitationEsthetic2019342940

15 

B Prabhu M Hedge A Sandhu A Desai Pradeep M Ragher Essentials of occlusal splint in the management of Temporomandibular disorders: Aliterature Review”.Int. J Curr Res 2015711599603

16 

MSI Nassar M Palinkas SC Regalo LG Sousa S Siéssere M Semprini The effect of a Lucia jig for 30 min on neuromuscular re-programming, in normal subjectsBrazilian Oral Res20122665305

17 

PH Wilson A Banerjee Recording the retruded contact position: A review of clinical techniquesBr Dent J20041967395402

18 

MF Land A Peregrina Anterior deprogramming device fabrication using a thermoplastic materialJ Prosthet Dent200390660818

19 

VF Ferrario G Serrao C Dellavia E Caruso C Sforza Relationship between the number of occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity in health young adultsCranio2002202919

20 

PHR Wilson A Banerjee Recording the retruded contact position: a review of clinical techniquesJ Prosthod Dent Occlusal Splints20201967395402

21 

MF Land A Peregrina Anterior deprogramming device fabrication using a thermoplastic material.J Prosthet Dent200390660810

22 

Laskin M Daniel CS Greene Temporomandibular Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment200637790

23 

H Stapelmann JC Türp The NTI-tss device for the therapy of bruxism, temporomandibular disorders, and headache - where do we stand? A qualitative systematic review of the literatureBMC Oral Health200882210.1186/1472-6831-8-22

25 

CP Pereira M Palinkas PB De Vasconcelos S Rancan Lucia Jig - temporomandibular dysfunction promotes muscle relaxation?Acta Scientiarum Health Sci201638219910.4025/actascihealthsci.v38i2.31825

26 

Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes Y El Hage AP Amaral F Politti DAB Gonzalez Effects of massage therapy and occlusal splint therapy on electromyographic activity and the intensity of signs and symptoms in individuals with temporomandibular disorder and sleep bruxism: a randomized clinical trialChiropr Man Therap20142214310.1186/s12998-014-0043-6

27 

JK Pficer S Dodic V Lazic G Trajkovic N Milic B Milicic Occlusal stabilization splint for patients with temporomandibular disorders: Meta-analysis of short and long term effectsPLoS One2017122e017129610.1371/journal.pone.0171296

28 

SP Ramfjord MM Ash Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splintJ Oral Rehabil1994215491500

29 

HM Tanner The Tanner Mandibular ApplianceJ Colo Dent Assoc1996752148PMID

30 

AJ Zonnenberg J Mulder The efficacy of a specific stabilization splintCranio20143216874

31 

GT Clark A critical evaluation of orthopedic interocclusal appliance therapy: design, theory, and overall effectivenessJ Am Dent Assoc1984108335964

32 

F Moloney JA Howard Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. III. Anterior repositioning splint therapyAust Dent J1986311309

33 

Z Ma Q Xie C Yang S Zhang Y Shen A Abdelrehem Can anterior repositioning splint effectively treat temporomandibular joint disc displacement? Sci Rep20199153410.1038/s41598-018-36988-8PMCID

34 

SA Hulland JO Lucas MA Wake KD Hesketh Eruption of the primary dentition in human infants: a prospective descriptive study. Pediatr DentPediatr Dent200022541536

35 

ML Gelb H Gelb Gelb appliance: mandibular orthopedic repositioning therapyCranio Clin Int1991128198

36 

TJ Moore DL Maria BD Hatfield MN Ryder LB Weiner The Mandibular Orthopedic Repositioning Appliance and its Effect on Power Production in Conditioned AthletesPhys Sportsmed1986141213745

37 

RA Pertes Updating the mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance (MORA)Cranio1987543516

38 

JS Dupont CE Brown Occlusal splints from the beginning to the presentCranio20062421416

39 

JP Okesson The effects of hard and soft occlusal splint on nocturnal bruxismJ Am Dent Assoc1987114678891

40 

MD Lerman The hydrostatic appliance: a new approach to treatment of the TMJ pain dysfunction syndromeJ Am Dent Assoc197489613518

41 

T Ito CH Gibbs R Marguelles-Bonnet SM Lupkiewicz HM Young HC Lundeen Loading on the temporomandibular joints with five occlusal conditionsJ Prosthet Dent198656447884

42 

SR Kilpatrick Use of the pivot appliance in the treatment of temporomandibular disordersCranio Clin Int19911210721

43 

MS Lakshmi MK Sufiyan R Mehta M Bhangdia K Rathore V Lalwani Occlusal splint therapy in temperomandibular joint disorders. An update reviewJ Int Oral Health20168563984



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 23-05-2022

Accepted : 25-07-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.adr.2022.012


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2805

PDF Downloaded: 389



Medical Abbreviation List