Get Permission Paul, Golchha, Yadav, Jhalani, and Bharadwaj: Mandibular growth direction prediction using symphysis morphology


Introduction

Growth and development are integral processes, which define the existence of life. Growth of an organism is the interplay between its genetic constitution and the environment in which it thrives. At the macroscopic or clinical level, growth is exemplified by an increase in height and weight, while at the microscopic level, it is accompanied by an increase in the number of cells and their size.1, 2

The mandible develops from the mandibular process of the first branchial arch. Mandibular growth occurs as a result of the combined processes of proliferation and ossification of secondary cartilage at the condyle, as well as differential formation and remodeling of bone along the entire surface of the mandible.

It is important to predict the magnitude and direction of mandibular growth in any case of orthodontic treatment. Mandibular growth is very critical in the development of balanced dentofacial structures and hence, influence the therapeutic result of orthodontic treatment. With the knowledge of mandibular growth, better therapeutic decisions can be made regarding timing and duration of the treatment, extraction pattern and possible need for surgery.

Prediction of mandibular growth pattern has been done by various parameters like condylar morphology,3 shape of lower border of mandible, 4 anterior facial height,5 cervical vertebrae,6 craniocervicalangle, 7 frontal sinus8 with varying degree of success.

Some authors found a significant association between mandibular morphology and growth direction3, 5, 9, 10, 11 whereas others have annulled any correlation between the two.12

Among the mandibular structures the mandibular symphyseal morphology serves as a reference anatomical landmark for esthetics and beauty of the face in general and of the lower part in particular. 13, 14 Functional environment can affect the shape and size of mandibular symphysis demonstrating an adaptive morphological response to the biomechanical loads experienced at various points in the masticatory cycle.15, 16 15,16 Studies conducted so far to find the correlation between symphysis morphology orantegonial notch and mandibular growth direction have got varied conclusions with some of studies concluding the relationship of symphysis morphology or antegonial notch with mandibular growth direction while some of the studies concluding that there is no relationship between the two. Most of these studies have been done on American and Caucasians population. Only few studies have been conducted on Asian population and hence the present study is undertaken to assess the reliability of symphyseal morphology as a predictor of direction of mandibular growth in Indian population.

Aims and Objectives

  1. To determine if morphology of symphysis morphology could be used as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth in Indian population.

  2. To determine if any gender variability exists in above study.

Materials and Methods

Pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 30 adult patients (15 males and 15 females) aged 18 years and above reporting to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics at Inderprashta Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad requiring orthodontic treatment were randomly selected.

Materials: (Figure 1)

Lateral cephalograms, tracing sheet (Company- Gateway; Thickness- 90 Micron), 0.3mm lead pencil, metallic scale and set squares.

Figure 1

Armamentarium

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/edfbb483-8f1d-4a17-ba4c-83d8f27f7a04image1.png

Inclusion criteria

  1. Good general and dental health.

  2. Age- 18 years and above.

  3. Complete dental occlusion (except third molars).

Exclusion criteria

Patient with history of

  1. Temporomandibular Joint Disorder

  2. Orthognathic Surgery.

  3. Craniofacial anomaly or Facial Asymmetry.

  4. History of trauma to mandible.

  5. Previous Orthodontic Treatment.

Methods

Lateral cephalograms were taken in natural head position so that all landmarks were readily identifiable on lateral cephalogram. Lateral cephalograms were traced manually using acetate tracing paper and 0.3 mm lead pencil

  1. SN to Y-axis angle– It is the angle between SN plane and Y-axis

    1. SN Plane- It is the cranial line between the centre of sellaturcica (Sella) and the most anterior point of the fronto-nasal suture (Nasion).

    2. Y-axis- It is measured as the acute angle formed by the intersection of a line from the sellaturcica to Gnathion with the Frankfort horizontal plane.

  2. SN- Mandibular Plane Angle- It is the angle between SN plane and mandibular plane.

    1. Mandibular Plane- Plane formed by a line joining Gonion and Menton.

  3. Palatal Plane- Mandibular Plane - It is the angle between Palatal Plane and Mandibular Plane.

    1. Palatal Plane- It is a plane formed by joining Anterior Nasal Spine (ANS) to Posterior Nasal Spine (PNS).

  4. Gonial Angle (Ar-Go-Me)- It is the angle formed by joining Articulare to Gonion and to Menton.

    1. Articulare- The point of intersection of the dorsal contours of the articular process of the mandible and the temporal bone.

    2. Gonion- The mostposteroinferior point on the angle of the mandible.

    3. Menton- The most inferior point on the chin.

  5. Bjork Sum- It is the sum of Saddle angle (N-S-Ar),Articulare angle (S-Ar-Go) and Gonial angle (Ar-Go-Me)

    1. Saddle angle (N-S-Ar)- It is the angle between the anterior and posterior cranial base.

    2. Articulare angle (S-Ar-Go)-It is the constructed angle between Sella, Articulare and Gonion.

  6. Percentage of LFH/TFH-It is the percentage of Lower Facial Height to Total Facial Height.

    1. LFH (Lower Facial Height) - It is a linear measurement from the Anterior Nasal Spine to Menton (ANS-Me).

    2. TFH (Total Facial Height) - It is a linear measurement from Nasion to Menton (N-Me).

  7. Posterior Facial Height (PFH)/Anterior Facial Height (AFH)- It is the percentage of PFH to AFH.

    1. PFH (Posterior Facial Height)- It is a linear measurement from Sella to Gonion (S-Go).

    2. AFH (Anterior Facial Height)- It is defined as the linear measurement from Nasion to Menton (N-Me).

Cephalometric evaluation of symphysis

  1. Calculation of Symphysis Dimensions- A line tangent to point B was taken as the long axis of the symphysis. A grid was placed with lines of grid parallel and perpendicular to constructed tangent line. Superior limit of symphysis was taken at point B with inferior, anterior and posterior limits taken at most inferior, anterior and posterior borders of symphyseal outline respectively. (Figure 2).

    1. Symphysis Height- Distance from superior to inferior limit on grid.

    2. Symphysis Depth- Distance from anterior to posterior limit on grid.

    3. Symphysis Ratio- Divide symphysis height by symphysis depth.

    4. Symphysis Angle-Postero superior angle formed by line through menton and point B and mandibular plane.

Figure 2

Measurement of symphyseal parameters

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/edfbb483-8f1d-4a17-ba4c-83d8f27f7a04image2.png

Results

Lateral Cephalograms of 30 adult patients (15 males and 15 females) reporting to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (U.P) aged 18 years and above were randomly selected and traced. Four symphyseal parameters (Height of Symphysis, Depth of Symphysis, and Symphysis Ratio, Symphysis Angle) and seven cephalometric parameters (S.N to Y-axis angle, SN-Mandibular Plane Angle, Palatal Plane- Mandibular Plane Angle, Gonial Angle, Bjork Sum, Percentage of Lower Facial Height to Total Facial Height, Posterior Facial Height to Anterior Facial Height) were measured.

The data was subjected to Pearson’s Correlation test to find any correlation between symphysis morphology and cephalometric parameters.

Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 shows the correlation between symphysis height and cephalometric parameters. In the overall sample (Table 1), there was a significant negative relationship between symphysis height and Bjork sum with p-value 0.016. There was no significant relationship between symphysis height and other cephalometric parameters. In the male group (Table 2) posterior facial height / anterior facial height ratio and symphysis height parameter showed a significant positive relationship with p-value 0.040 while all other values showed no significant relationship. In female group (Table 3), there was no significant relationship between height of symphysis and cephalometric parameters.

Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 shows correlation between symphysis depth and cephalometric parameters. In the over-all sample (Table 4), it was found that there is significant positive relationship between depth of symphysis and posterior facial height/ anterior facial height ratio with p-value 0.033. In the male and female groups (Table 5, Table 6), there was no significant correlation between depth of symphysis and cephalometric parameters.

Table 7, Table 8, Table 9 shows correlation between symphysis ratio and cephalometric parameters. In the overall group (Table 7), there was not a significant relationship between symphysis ratio and cephalometric parameters. In the male group (Table 8), it was found that there was a significant positive relationship between symphysis ratio and posterior facial height to anterior facial height with p-value 0.022 while all other values showed no significant relationship. In the female group (Table 9), there was not a significant relationship between symphysis ratio and cephalometric parameters.

Table 1

Correlation of height of symphysis with cephalometric parametersin overall group

Over-all Group

Height of Symphysis (mm)

S.N to Yaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.278

Angle

P-value

0.138

(Degree)

N

30

SN-Mandibular Plane

Pearson Correlation

-0.291

Angle

P-value

0.119

(Degree)

N

30

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.161

Plane Angle

P-value

0.397

(Degree)

N

30

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.338

Angle

P-value

0.068

(Degree)

N

30

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.437

Sum

P-value

0.016*

(Degree)

N

30

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.057

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.766

Facial Height (%)

N

30

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.312

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.094

Facial Height (%)

N

30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 2

Correlation of height of symphysis with cephalometric parameters in male group

Male Group

Height of Symphysis (mm)

S.N to Yaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.429

Angle

P-value

0.110

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.464

Plane Angle

P-value

0.082

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal Plane-Mandibular Plane

Pearson Correlation

-0.291

Angle

P-value

0.292

(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.068

Angle

P-value

0.811

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.411

Sum

P-value

0.128

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.179

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.524

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.534

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.040*

Facial Height (%)

N

15

[i] *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 3

Correlation of height of symphysis with cephalometricparameters in female group

Female group

Height of Symphysis (mm)

S.N toYaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.073

Angle

P-value

0.797

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

0.076

Plane Angle

P-value

0.787

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

0.197

Plane Angle

P-value

0.482

(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.386

Angle

P-value

0.156

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.386

Sum

P-value

0.156

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.141

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.617

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

-0.023

Height to Anterior Facial

P-value

0.934

Height (%)

N

15

Table 4

Correlation of depth of symphysis with cephalometric parameters in overall group

Over-all Group

Depth of Symphysis (mm)

S.N to Yaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.358

Angle

P-value

0.052

(Degree)

N

30

SN-Mandibular Plane

Pearson Correlation

-0.337

Angle

P-value

0.069

(Degree)

N

30

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.280

Plane Angle

P-value

0.134

(Degree)

N

30

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.357

Angle

P-value

0.053

(Degree)

N

30

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.345

Sum

P-value

0.062

(Degree)

N

30

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

-0.206

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.276

Facial Height (%)

N

30

Posterior Facial Height to

Pearson Correlation

0.390

Anterior Facial

P-value

0.033*

Height (%)

N

30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 5

Correlation of depth of symphysis with cephalometric parameters in male group

Male

Depth of Symphysis (mm)

S.N toYaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.419

Angle

P-value

0.120

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.141

Plane Angle

P-value

0.617

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.104

Plane Angle

P-value

0.712

(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

0.077

Angle

P-value

0.785

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

0.013

Sum

P-value

0.965

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.162

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.564

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.066

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.817

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Table 6

Correlation of depth of symphysis with cephalometric parameters in female group

Female

Depth of Symphysis (mm)

S.N toYaxis

Pearson Correlation

-0.440

Angle

P-value

0.101

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.360

Plane Angle

P-value

0.187

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.381

Plane Angle

P-value

0.161

(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.396

Angle

P-value

0.144

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork Sum (Degree)

Pearson Correlation

-0.460

P-value

0.084

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

-0.307

Facial Height to Total

P-value

0.266

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.469

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.078

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Table 7

Correlation of symphysis ratio with cephalometric parameters in overall group.

Over-all sample

Symphysis ratio

S.N to

Pearson Correlation

0.088

Yaxis Angle

P-value

0.643

(Degree)

N

30

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

0.033

Plane Angle

P-value

0.861

(Degree)

N

30

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

0.102

Plane Angle

P-value

0.591

(Degree)

N

30

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

0.072

Angle

P-value

0.704

(Degree)

N

30

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.058

Sum

P-value

0.759

(Degree)

N

30

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.228

Facial Height to

P-value

0.225

Total Facial Height (%)

N

30

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

-0.059

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.758

Facial Height (%)

N

30

Table 8

Correlation of symphysis ratio with cephalometric parameters in male group

Male

Symphysis ratio

S.N to

Pearson Correlation

-0.246

Yaxis Angle

P-value

0.376

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.461

Plane Angle

P-value

0.084

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal Plane-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

-0.275

Plane

P-value

0.320

Angle(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

-0.125

Angle

P-value

0.656

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

-0.483

Sum

P-value

0.068

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.103

Facial Height to

P-value

0.715

Total Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.585

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.022*

Facial Height (%)

N

15

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 9

Correlation of symphysis ratio with cephalometric parameters in female group

Female

Symphysis ratio

S.N to

Pearson Correlation

0.383

Yaxis Angle

P-value

0.159

(Degree)

N

15

SN-Mandibular

Pearson Correlation

0.323

Plane Angle

P-value

0.241

(Degree)

N

15

Palatal

Pearson Correlation

0.434

Plane-Mandibular

P-value

0.106

Plane Angle(Degree)

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

0.154

Angle

P-value

0.585

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

0.178

Sum

P-value

0.526

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

0.340

Facial Height to

P-value

0.215

Total Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

-0.395

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.145

Facial Height (%)

N

15

N

15

Gonial

Pearson Correlation

0.097

Angle

P-value

0.730

(Degree)

N

15

Bjork

Pearson Correlation

0.025

Sum

P-value

0.928

(Degree)

N

15

Percentage of Lower

Pearson Correlation

-0.332

Facial Height to

P-value

0.227

Total Facial Height (%)

N

15

Posterior Facial

Pearson Correlation

0.168

Height to Anterior

P-value

0.550

Facial Height (%)

N

15

Discussion

The present study was undertaken to find the correlation if any between symphyseal morphological parameters or antegonial notch depth and mandibular growth direction.

Symphyseal parameters (height, depth, ratio and angle), antegonial notch depth and seven cephalometric parameters (S.N to Y-axis angle, SN-Mandibular plane angle, Palatal plane- Mandibular plane angle, Gonial angle, Bjork sum, Percentage of lower facial height to total facial height, Percentage of posterior facial height to anterior facial height) predicting growth directions were measured for 30 patients (15 Males, 15 Females).

Pearson correlation test was done to find any correlation between symphysis morphology and cephalometric parameters among overall group and separately for male and female group.

Pearson correlation test indicated that in overall group, there was a significant negative relationship between symphysis height and Bjork sum. This further indicates that the decrease in symphyseal height is associated with vertical growth pattern. Also it was found that in overall group, there is a positive correlation between depth of symphysis and posterior facial height / anterior facial height ratio. This indicates that increase in depth of symphysis is associated with horizontal growth pattern.

In male group, Pearson correlation test indicated that there is significant positive correlation between symphysis height and posterior facial height / anterior facial height ratio. It denotes that increase in symphyseal height is associated with increase in Posterior Facial Height/ Anterior Facial Height ratio i.e. horizontal growth pattern.

Symphysis ratio and Posterior Facial Height/Anterior Facial Height was found to be having significant positive correlation in male sample which further indicates that increase in symphyseal ratio is associated with increase in Posterior Facial Height/ Anterior Facial Height i.e. horizontal growth pattern.

Thus, the present study results indicate that increase in height and depth of symphysis are associated with horizontal growth pattern in overall sample. In males increase in height and symphysis ratio is associated with horizontal growth pattern.

The results of this study are similar to the study done by Aki et al (1994)5 in context to depth of symphysis where increase in depth was associated with horizontal growth pattern.

Conclusion

The conclusion of the present study-

  1. Increase in depth and height of symphysis is associated with horizontal growth pattern in overall sample.

  2. Increase in height and smphyseal ratio is associated with horizontal growth pattern in males.

  3. In females symphyseal parameters fail to predict the direction of mandibular growth.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

1 

L Molinary T Gasser R Hauspie N Cameron L Molinari The human growth curve: Distance, velocity and accelerationMethods in Human Growth ResearchCambridge, Cambridge University Press20042755

2 

N Cameron Human growth curve, canalization and catch up growthHuman Growth and DevelopmentElsevier SciencesCalifornia2002120

3 

A Bjork Prediction of mandibular growth rotationAm J19695565859910.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0

4 

V Skieller A Bjork T Linde-Hansen Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sampleAm J Orthod19848653597010.1016/s0002-9416(84)90028-9

5 

T Aki RS Nanda GF Currier SK Nanda Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growthAm J Orthod1994106160910.1016/S0889-5406(94)70022-2

6 

JAV Huggare M S Cooke Head posture and cervicovertebral anatomy as mandibular growth predictorsEur J Orthod19941631758010.1093/ejo/16.3.175

7 

B Solow S Siersback-Nielsen Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growthAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop199210154495810.1016/0889-5406(92)70119-u

8 

PE Rossouw CJ Lombard AM Harris The frontal sinus and mandibular growth predictionAm J Orthod19911006542610.1016/0889-5406(91)70095-E

9 

SN Al-Khateeb EF Al Maaitah ESA Alhaija SA Badran Mandibular symphysismorphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationshipsAngle Orthod2014842304910.2319/030513-185.1

10 

CP Singer The depth of the antegonial notch as an indicator of mandibular growth potentialAm J Orthod196889528

11 

AHD Lambrechts AMP Harris PE Rossouw I Stander Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notchingAngle Orthod19966642657210.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0265:DDITCM>2.3.CO;2

12 

RP Kolodziej TE Southard KA Southard JS Casko JR Jakobsen Evaluation of antegonial notch depth for growth predictionAm J Orthod200212143576310.1067/mod.2002.121561

13 

J F Hoeing Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experienceAesthetic Plast Surg20073143849110.1007/s00266-006-0177-6

14 

PH Buschang K Julien R Sachdeva A Demirjian Child-hood and pubertal growth changes of the human symphysisAngle Orthod19926232031010.1043/0003-3219(1992)062<0203:CAPGCO>2.0.CO;2

15 

R M Beecher Evolution of the mandibular symphysis in Notharctinae (Adaptive Primates)Int J Primatol198349911210.1007/BF02739362

16 

B Brown DR Begun CV Ward MD Rose Miocene hominoid mandibles: functional and phylogenetic perspectivesPhytogeny and FossilsPlenum Press199715372



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 22-06-2022

Accepted : 09-07-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.adr.2022.008


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 425

PDF Downloaded: 228



Medical Abbreviation List