Get Permission Jawlekar, Garg, and Gupta: General principles governing record taking in patients with cleft lip and palate


Introduction

One of the most common congenital anomaly we come across is the Cleft Lip and palate where affected children suffer from range of functional as well as aesthetic problems. Cleft lip and palate is a multifunctional disease associated with environmental factors. Management of cleft is a complex procedure and demands co-operation among experts from different fields. Clinical treatment procedure extends from beginning of birth, to achieving skeletal maturity effectively. It is thus very important to note and record all the features affecting growth and final outcome of result in cleft palate patients. Cleft treatment is a complex multifactorial aspect involving specialist in multidisciplinary field like Pedodontist, Speech therapist, Oral surgeon, Nurse, ENT, Maxillo-facial surgeon, Prosthodontics, and Psychiatrist. As the orthodontic treatment of patients with cleft is extensive, the orthodontist plays an important role in timing and sequence of treatment.

Record for treatment planning /monitoring2

Clinical records should be taken for individual patients to allow treatment planning, monitoring treatment progress and treatment evaluation. The timing and nature of these records will depend on the clinical protocols followed by individual teams. Treatment and associated record taking protocols should be agreed and clearly set out by the cleft team.

Table 1

Complete Cleft Lip and palate (UCLP & BCLP)

Timing

Models

Lat. skulll Radio Graphy

Photographs

Speech/Tympanometry

Audiometry

PT/Parent Satisfaction.

Primary surgery

v

---

v

v

v

3yrs

-

-

v

v*

v*

5/6 years

v

v

v*

v

10 yrs

v

v

v*

v*

v

V

v

v

v

18yrs

v

V

v

v

v

Table 2

Left palateonly2

Timing

Models

Lat.skull radiograph

Photographs

Speech /tympanometry

Audiometry

Patient/parent Satisfaction.

Primary surgery

vL

v

3 years

v

v

5/6 years

v

v

v

15/16 years

v

v

v

v

v

Table 3

Left lip only.2

Timing

Models

Photographs

Patient parent satisfaction

Primary surgery

V*

v

3years

5/6 years

V*

v

10 years

18+ years

v

v

[i] *Indicates if hard palate is closed.

Table 4

Alveolar Bone Grafting 2

Timing

Intra oral x ray

Photographs

Just before bone graft

v

v

6 months after

v

After canine fully Erupted

v

v

Table 5

V Pharnngoplasty2

Timing

Speech sample

Just before operation

v

One year after operation

v

Table 6

Timing

Lateral cephalogram

Models

Just before operation

v

v

One year after Operation

v

v

Table 7

Procedure

Timing

Cleft lip repair

After 10 weeks

Cleft palate

9 to 18 months

Pharyngeal flap or pharyngoplasty

3 to 5 years or later based on speech development.

Maxillary/Alveolar reconstruction with bone grafting

6 to 9 yrs based on dental development

Cleft Orthognathic surgery

14 to 16 yrs in girls

16 to 18 yrs in boys

Cleft Rhinoplasty

After age 5 but preferably at skeletal maturing; after orthognathic surgery whenever possible.

Cleft Lip revision

Anytime once initial modelling and scar maturation is complete.

Record for quality improvement/Research. Additional records are taken for

  1. To allow retrospective comparison of different protocols.

  2. As a part of prospective clinical trial with ethical approval.

  3. As part of an agreed protocol for intercentre quality-improvement comparisons or comparisons against known standards.

  4. As a part of an agreed research protocols.

  5. Other reason, such as medicolegal second opinion.

Research and quality improvement records should coincide as far as possible with the records of treatment planning/monitoring.

Safeguards to be considered

  1. Exposure of patients to unnecessary radiation should be avoided.

  2. Research and quality improvement records should be taken when there is a

  3. Established protocol on how they will be put to use, and with the consent of the patient/parent/Guardian. Timing of Minimum Records2

Records taking methodology3

Discussion of the precise method of record taking is constantly under consideration globally. The currently followed protocol widely in Europe is being discussed in the discussion.

Photographs

Clear photographs taken with standardization are helpful. Video recordings taken in standardized Way recorded for cleft pre/post operatively are preferred but used by few clinicians. Basic views recommended are:Frontal/Both Laterals Three-quarter Facial oblique view.

Dynamic views

During smiling and whistling will give an idea of function of the circumoral musculature. Video recordings are preferred but standardization has to be set yet.

Lighting and Background

Lighting of the studio should be two fill-in lights and the main light synchronized with the camera. For wards or operating theatres a single flash unit is appropriate. Blue background is recommended.

Framing of the picture

  1. For frontal view the camera has to be set at a ratio of 1:8

  2. For Lateral view, the camera should be set at a ratio of 1:8

  3. For inferior view, the camera should be set at a ratio of 1:4

Camera and len

Suggested camera is Nikon with a 105mm lens or equivalent. Film type and speed need not be standardized.

Dental cast

Dental cast need to be made from well taken impressions including all teeth, the palate and buccal sulcus. For comparative studies the cast need to be prepared in a standard manner so that source of models cannot be identified. Models should be cast in vaccum — mixed white stone, hand trimmed, using a fine wheel to the standard heights and angles as per specifications. Finishing is preferred with wet and dry paper and not soaped.

Speech4

A fundamental problem for speech and language pathology is the lack of an unacceptable framework for measuring speech. The Great Ormond street assessment (GOS.SP. ASS) tool, Which is nationally agreed speech assessment tool for cleft palate/valo-pharangeal incompetence in English Harland in 1987 devised the Cleft Audit Protocol for speech (CAPS) a more succinct protocol specifically designed for audit purpose. A -good quality audio recording using high quality microphone is recommended for measuring Intelligibility, Nasality and assessing articulation. Errors made can be broadly categorized or group according to Front of mouth oral sound errors; Back of mouth oral-sound errors; Non oral sounds; Passive errors and immaturities. Good record keeping lays a foundation for planning a definite treatment plan with team support. Treatment protocol5 of patients with cleft lip and cleft palate for staged reconstruction can be considered as:

Antenatal diagnosi:6

Three dimensional/four-dimensional Ultrasound methods gives better quality picture for parents, benefits the foetal magnetic resonance imaging and offers a realistic means of predicting important information about the palate which has a bearing upon Childs feeding, speech and facial growth capacity. Targeted level II ultrasound is designed to check babie’s anatomy is the best method for prenatal diagnosis for cleft. Twenty weeks foetal anomaly ultrasound scanning should include observation of facial elements as routine. Administration of 0.4mg of Folic acid7 reduces the risk of cleft lip by 1/3rd. It is a vitamin found in leafy vegetable, beans, citrus fruits, and whole grains. Folic acid reduces the risk of neural tube defects including spina bifida.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

WHO meeting on:General principles governing record taking. international colloberative research on craniofacial anomalies2001https://www.who.int/genomics/anomalies/en/CFA-RegistryMeeting-2001.pdf

2 

Smile train inc (USA:Smile train guidelines for treatment of cleft lip and Palate2006https://www.dmimsu.edu.in/smile-train-project

3 

WHO Human Genetics Addressing global challenges of craniofacial anomalies.disease and health promotion Geneva 2-420041135https://www.who.int/genomics/publications/CFA%20Completed%20text.pdf

4 

B Hutters G Henningsson Speech Outcome following Treatment in Cross-Linguistic Cleft Palate Studies: Methodological ImplicationsCleft Palate-Craniofac J2004415544910.1597/02-164.1

5 

K Pradhan S K Bhatnagar A K Singh V Kumar Design of a case file for cleft lip and palate SKJ Indian ortho soc2001343347710.1177/0974909820010303

6 

V Aksingh R Kumar S Naithani C Campbell Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D "reverse face" viewUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200525112810.1002/uog.1819

7 

A J Willcox R T Lie K Solvoll J Taylor Folic acid supplements and risk of facial clefts: national population based case-control studyBMJ2007334759146410.1136/bmj.39079.618287.0B



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 08-06-2021

Accepted : 12-07-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.adr.2021.013


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 743

PDF Downloaded: 229